HTTP Action Workflow JSON Body Issue

[ashish_kumar3284 (Ashish Kumar)]

Hello All,

I am encountering issues while passing a JSON body to the HTTP action in the workflow. Inline variables are not resolving within the JSON body. However, they resolve correctly when assigned through the “Define Variable” operator.

Additionally, one of the JSON elements expects an integer value, but it is being passed as a string.

Error in JSON Body:

Any suggestions on resolving this issue?

Thanks,
Ashish Kumar

[Kyle_R (Kyle Rust)]

Hello Ashish, If I’m following correctly, there was a
limitation in workflows that could not support this. See this link here:

Workflow passing array to Json Body

Update: This is now fixed. Please use .JSON() when referencing objects or arrays in your inline variables. See Workflows Improvements: Correct string length and support for objects and arrays in inline variables for more info. This is a known limitation with inline variables. Objects and arrays do not serialize to proper JSON. Instead, they are serialized as Golang maps/arrays. This is why you see arrays being presented without commas and objects that have the map[] keyword in them when r…

However, recently found that there was an enhancement made. See here:

Workflows Improvements: Correct string length and support for objects and arrays in inline variables

The Workflows team has just released two updates to the workflow engine. Correct string length Previously, there was an issue in the JSONpath library used by Workflows that always added 2 to the length of a string when using a JSONpath like $.string.length(). This did not affect arrays. A string like “hello” would result in a value of 7 when using the .length() function. This has been fixed in the latest release, and the length function will now return the correct length, which is 5 in the “hel…

Hope this helps!

[ashish_kumar3284 (Ashish Kumar)]

Thank you for sharing the links, @Kyle_R. It is beneficial.

I have to build something custom to achieve this.