Entitlement is ignored when IT role has both entitlement and provisioning policy

nvk1 · April 21, 2025, 6:50am

Which IIQ version are you inquiring about?

*8.4p1

Please share any images or screenshots, if relevant.

The user has moved to the OU as defined by provisioning policy, but there was no trigger to add Azure group. If we check entitlement details, it does not show the Azure group at all.

Arpitha1 · April 21, 2025, 9:22am

Hi @nvk1
Enable below option

system · June 20, 2025, 9:23am

This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.

Topic		Replies	Views
IT role is not assigned IIQ Discussion and Questions identityiq , provisioning	13	200	August 30, 2025
Role Based Provsion IIQ Discussion and Questions identityiq , provisioning	5	82	June 7, 2025
Webservice - Provisioning must delete existing entitlement before adding (Only add API call available)) IIQ Discussion and Questions identityiq , provisioning , roles	6	137	March 24, 2025
Entitlement not provisioning to cube, but others are from Business Role IIQ Discussion and Questions identityiq , provisioning , roles , entitlements	3	105	July 15, 2024
Removing Azure AD Entitlements using Services Standard Before provisioning rule ISC Discussion and Questions identity-security-cloud , provisioning , entitlements	7	577	October 7, 2023

Entitlement is ignored when IT role has both entitlement and provisioning policy

Which IIQ version are you inquiring about?

Please share any images or screenshots, if relevant.

Related topics