Hi all,
We see some strange behavior with access recommendations. Can someone explain why this is a “NO”?
},
“recommendation”: “NO”,
“interpretations”: [
“99% of identities with the same peer group have this access. This information had a high impact on the overall score.”,
“71% of identities with the same location have this access. This information had a high impact on the overall score.”,
“48% of identities with the same department have this access. This information had a low impact on the overall score.”
],
The entitlement in question is not marked as privileged. In my head this should be “YES”, but there might be something that I have missed.
Kind regards,
Jarle